<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>ejsss</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND STRATEGIC STUDIES</JournalTitle>
      <PISSN/>
      <EISSN/>
      <Volume-Issue>Volume 3 Issue 3</Volume-Issue>
      <PartNumber/>
      <IssueTopic>Multidisciplinary</IssueTopic>
      <IssueLanguage>English</IssueLanguage>
      <Season>Dec 2022-Jan 2023</Season>
      <SpecialIssue>N</SpecialIssue>
      <SupplementaryIssue>N</SupplementaryIssue>
      <IssueOA>Y</IssueOA>
      <PubDate>
        <Year>2023</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>31</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <ArticleType>Political Science</ArticleType>
      <ArticleTitle>Status competition or Conflict of interest: Understanding China-India Asymmetrical rivalry in the Indian Ocean region</ArticleTitle>
      <SubTitle/>
      <ArticleLanguage>English</ArticleLanguage>
      <ArticleOA>Y</ArticleOA>
      <FirstPage>314</FirstPage>
      <LastPage>327</LastPage>
      <AuthorList>
        <Author>
          <FirstName>Ravi</FirstName>
          <LastName>Kumar</LastName>
          <AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage>
          <Affiliation/>
          <CorrespondingAuthor>N</CorrespondingAuthor>
          <ORCID/>
        </Author>
      </AuthorList>
      <DOI>10.47362/EJSSS.2023.3303</DOI>
      <Abstract>Status competition in world politics always played a greater role, especially the developing powers who strive for greater status in world politics, and so do both India and China. This article tries to examine the nature of the conflict between India and China through the framework of Status competition while at the same time comparatively examining it with other conflict models such as Conflict of interest, Zero-sum game and Status Dilemma. The article demonstrates that India-China relations in general and in the IOR (Indian Ocean region) should not always be scrutinized through the zero-sum game concept. The status competition model differs from other conflict models in a way that can accommodate the asymmetrical power gap between India and China in IOR. Also, the Status accommodation model provides policymakers in Beijing and New Delhi to avoid conflict-ridden zero-sum game thinking.</Abstract>
      <AbstractLanguage>English</AbstractLanguage>
      <Keywords>Indian ocean region,conflict,Status-Competition,Cooperation,India-China relations,Zero-sum gae,asymmetric,Indian Ocean region,Conflict,Status-competition,India-China,relations,cooperation,Asymmetric</Keywords>
      <URLs>
        <Abstract>https://ejsss.net.in/ubijournal-v1copy/journals/abstract.php?article_id=14312&amp;title=Status competition or Conflict of interest: Understanding China-India Asymmetrical rivalry in the Indian Ocean region</Abstract>
      </URLs>
      <References>
        <ReferencesarticleTitle>References</ReferencesarticleTitle>
        <ReferencesfirstPage>16</ReferencesfirstPage>
        <ReferenceslastPage>19</ReferenceslastPage>
        <References>Acharya, Amitav. 2008. Asia Rising: Who Is Leading? World Scientific.&#13;
&#13;
Bajpai, Kanti P. 2021. India Versus China: Why They Are Not Friends. Juggernaut Books.&#13;
&#13;
Brewster, David. 2016. “India and China at Sea: A Contest of Status and Legitimacy in the Indian Ocean.” Asia Policy (22):4–10.&#13;
&#13;
Chaudhuri, Shubham, and Martin Ravallion. 2006. Partially Awakened Giants: Uneven Growth in China and India. Vol. 4069. World Bank Publications.&#13;
&#13;
China, Werner Levi Modern. 1953. “S Foreign Policy.”&#13;
&#13;
Colaresi, Michael P., Karen Rasler, and William R. Thompson. 2008. Strategic Rivalries in World Politics: Position, Space and Conflict Escalation. Cambridge University Press.&#13;
&#13;
Cordesman, Anthony H., and Abdullah Toukan. 2014. The Indian Ocean Region: A Strategic Net Assessment. Rowman and; Littlefield.&#13;
&#13;
Das, Gurcharan. 2006. “The India Model.” Foreign Aff. 85:2.&#13;
&#13;
DiCicco, Jonathan M., and Jack S. Levy. 1999. “Power Shifts and Problem Shifts: The Evolution of the Power Transition Research Program.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 43(6):675–704.&#13;
&#13;
Duque, Marina G. 2018. “Recognizing International Status: A Relational Approach.” International Studies Quarterly 62(3):577–92.&#13;
&#13;
Fang, Tien-sze. 2013. “Asymmetrical Threat Perceptions in India-China Relations.”&#13;
&#13;
Frank, Robert H. 2001. Luxury Fever: Why Money Fails to Satisfy in an Era of Excess. Simon and Schuster.&#13;
&#13;
Garver, John. 2002. “Asymmetrical Indian and Chinese Threat Perceptions.” Journal of Strategic Studies 25(4):109–34.&#13;
&#13;
Garver, John W. 2002. The China-India-US Triangle: Strategic Relations in the Post-Cold War Era. Vol. 13. National Bureau of Asian Research.&#13;
&#13;
Garver, John W. 2011. Protracted Contest: Sino-Indian Rivalry in the Twentieth Century. University of Washington Press.&#13;
&#13;
Garver, John W. 2019. “Calculus of a Chinese Decision for Local War with India.” Pp. 85–105 in India and China in Asia. Routledge.&#13;
&#13;
Glaser, Charles L. 1997. “The Security Dilemma Revisited.” World Politics 50(1):171–201.&#13;
&#13;
Gokhale, Vijay. 2021. “The Road from Galwan: The Future of India-China Relations.”&#13;
&#13;
Goldstein, Joshua S. 2008. International Relations. Pearson Education India.&#13;
&#13;
Hall, Ian. 2019. “Nonalignment to Multialignment.” Pp. 21–40 in Modi and the Reinvention of Indian Foreign Policy. Bristol University Press.&#13;
&#13;
Horner, Charles. 2015. “Restless Empire: China and the World since 1750, by Odd Arne Westad.” Naval War College Review 68(1):13.&#13;
&#13;
Jaishankar, S. 2020. “The India Way: Strategies for an Uncertain World.” New Delhi.&#13;
&#13;
Kim, Woosang, and James D. Morrow. 1992. “When Do Power Shifts Lead to War?” American Journal of Political Science 896–922.&#13;
&#13;
Larson, Deborah Welch, Tarzha Varkey Paul, and William C. Wohlforth. 2014. “Status and World Order.” Status in World Politics 3–29.&#13;
&#13;
Lebow, Richard Ned. 2008. A Cultural Theory of International Relations. Cambridge University Press.&#13;
&#13;
MacDonald, Paul K., and Joseph M. Parent. 2021. “The Status of Status in World Politics.” World Politics 73(2):358–91.&#13;
&#13;
Malone, David M. 2011. Does the Elephant Dance?: Contemporary Indian Foreign Policy. OUP Oxford.&#13;
&#13;
Mattingly, Daniel C. 2022. “How the Party Commands the Gun: The Foreign–Domestic Threat Dilemma in China.” American Journal of Political Science.&#13;
&#13;
Mearsheimer, John J., and Glenn Alterman. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. WW Norton and; Company.&#13;
&#13;
Nayar, Baldev Raj, and Thazha Varkey Paul. 2003. India in the World Order: Searching for Major-Power Status. Cambridge University Press.&#13;
&#13;
O’Donnell, Frank, and Alex Bollfrass. 2020. The Strategic Postures of China and India: A Visual Guide. Harvard Kennedy School, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.&#13;
&#13;
Panikkar, Kavalam Madhava. 1955. In Two Chinas: Memoirs of a Diplomat. London, Allen.&#13;
&#13;
Pant, Harsh V. 2020. Indian Foreign Policy in a Unipolar World. Taylor and; Francis.&#13;
&#13;
Paul, TV. 2018. “Explaining Conflict and Cooperation in the China-India Rivalry.” The China-India Rivalry in the Globalization Era 3–26.&#13;
&#13;
Pei, Minxin. 2011. “Dangerous Misperceptions: Chinese Views of India’s Rise.” India in Transition.&#13;
&#13;
Pu, Xiaoyu. 2017. “Ambivalent Accommodation: Status Signalling of a Rising India and China’s Response.” International Affairs 93(1):147–63.&#13;
&#13;
Pu, Xiaoyu. 2019. Rebranding China: Contested Status Signaling in the Changing Global Order. Stanford University Press.&#13;
&#13;
Pu, Xiaoyu. 2022. “The Status Dilemma in World Politics: An Anatomy of the China–India Asymmetrical Rivalry.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 15(3):227–45. doi: 10.1093/cjip/poac015.&#13;
&#13;
Raghavan, Srinath. 2019. “The Security Dilemma and India–China Relations.” Asian Security 15(1):60–72.&#13;
&#13;
Rajagopalan, Rajesh. 2019. “Did India Lose China?” The Washington Quarterly 42(1):71–87.&#13;
&#13;
Rajagopalan, Rajesh. 2020. “Evasive Balancing: India’s Unviable Indo-Pacific Strategy.” International Affairs 96(1):75–93.&#13;
&#13;
Rana, Kishan S. 2015. “Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Visit to China, May 2015.” China Report 51(4):327–38.&#13;
&#13;
Roy, Denny. 1998. China’s Foreign Relations. Rowman and; Littlefield.&#13;
&#13;
Ruisheng, Cheng. 2011. “Reflections from China.” Journal of International Affairs 64(2):213–19.&#13;
&#13;
Saran, Shyam. 2017. How India Sees the World: Kautilya to the 21st Century. Juggernaut Books.&#13;
&#13;
Schweller, Randall L. 1996. “Neorealism’s Status?quo Bias: What Security Dilemma?” Security Studies 5(3):90–121.&#13;
&#13;
Shankar, Mahesh. 2018. “Territory and the China-India Competition.” The China-India Rivalry in the Globalisation Era 27–53.&#13;
&#13;
Shirk, Susan L. 2004. “One-Sided Rivalry: China’s Perceptions and Policies toward India.” The India-China Relationship: What the United States Needs to Know 75–100.&#13;
&#13;
Shirk, Susan L. 2022. “Overreach: How China Derailed Its Peaceful Rise.”&#13;
&#13;
Singh, Abhay Kumar. 2021. “India-China Rivalry: Asymmetric No Longer.”&#13;
&#13;
Smith, Jeff M. 2013. Cold Peace: China–India Rivalry in the Twenty-First Century. Lexington Books.&#13;
&#13;
Snyder, Glenn H. 1971. “‘ Prisoner’s Dilemma’ and" Chicken" Models in International Politics.” International Studies Quarterly 15(1):66–103.&#13;
&#13;
Tang, Shiping. 2010. “The Security Dilemma: A Conceptual Analysis.” Pp. 33–71 in A Theory of Security Strategy for Our Time. Springer.&#13;
&#13;
Tellis, Ashley J., and Sean Mirski. 2013. “Crux of Asia: China, India, and the Emerging Global Order.”&#13;
&#13;
Waltz, Kenneth N. 2015. “The Origins of War in Neorealist Theory.” Pp. 110–16 in Conflict After the Cold War. Routledge.&#13;
&#13;
Wohlforth, William C. 2012. “Status Dilemmas and Inter-State Conflict.” Status and World Order, TV Paul, Deborah Larson, and William C. Wohlforth, Eds., Forthcoming.</References>
      </References>
    </Journal>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>