<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
<PublisherName>ejsss</PublisherName>
<JournalTitle>ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND STRATEGIC STUDIES</JournalTitle>
<PISSN/>
<EISSN/>
<Volume-Issue>Volume 4 Issue 3</Volume-Issue>
<PartNumber/>
<IssueTopic>Multidisciplinary</IssueTopic>
<IssueLanguage>English</IssueLanguage>
<Season>Dec 2023-Jan 2024</Season>
<SpecialIssue>N</SpecialIssue>
<SupplementaryIssue>N</SupplementaryIssue>
<IssueOA>Y</IssueOA>
<PubDate>
<Year>2024</Year>
<Month>01</Month>
<Day>31</Day>
</PubDate>
<ArticleType>International Relations</ArticleType>
<ArticleTitle>The New Era of Globalism: Redefining Globalisation through International Initiatives, Alliances and Associations</ArticleTitle>
<SubTitle/>
<ArticleLanguage>English</ArticleLanguage>
<ArticleOA>Y</ArticleOA>
<FirstPage>339</FirstPage>
<LastPage>355</LastPage>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
<FirstName>Anmol Rattan</FirstName>
<LastName>Singh</LastName>
<AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage>
<Affiliation/>
<CorrespondingAuthor>N</CorrespondingAuthor>
<ORCID/>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<DOI>10.47362/EJSSS.2023.4303</DOI>
<Abstract>Globalisation, as the world’s transformative phenomenon, is emblematic of the convergence of diverse nations under an encompassing network characterised by intricate economic structures, moral frameworks, and shared political foundations. The contemporary iteration of globalisation is undeniably intertwined with the interests and strategic motivations of nation-states. Nevertheless, this manifestation grapples with three fundamental challenges: it impedes the progress of unfettered global trade, thus hindering the global economic agenda; it propagates disparities and exerts detrimental effects on democratic governance; and it does not consistently align with democratic principles. The dynamic interplay and diplomatic engagements among nations have spawned a well-defined international trade and cooperation framework. Notably, a novel paradigm of “alliance or coalition globalisation” is materialising, eclipsing national interests in favour of regional prosperity and shared interests among diverse nations. This evolving concept introduces a new “invisible hand” in the global capitalist model, focusing on regional economic development and connectivity as top priorities for modern nation-states. Consequently, it safeguards and advances regional interests. This paper elucidates how these emerging coalitions serve as catalysts for a global paradigm shift, reconfiguring the landscape of economic and commercial interactions worldwide. The mandates include upholding territorial integrity, non-interference by international organisations in domestic affairs, balanced roles within the global order, reforming the United Nations Security Council, and ensuring that a limited number of countries no longer dictate international objectives. This new wave of globalisation promises to reshape global dynamics to reflect a more equitable and cooperative international landscape.</Abstract>
<AbstractLanguage>English</AbstractLanguage>
<Keywords>Globalisation, Strategy, Economic agenda, Coalition globalisation, Invisible hand, Territorial integrity, Connectivity, Network</Keywords>
<URLs>
<Abstract>https://ejsss.net.in/ubijournal-v1copy/journals/abstract.php?article_id=15022&title=The New Era of Globalism: Redefining Globalisation through International Initiatives, Alliances and Associations</Abstract>
</URLs>
<References>
<ReferencesarticleTitle>References</ReferencesarticleTitle>
<ReferencesfirstPage>16</ReferencesfirstPage>
<ReferenceslastPage>19</ReferenceslastPage>
<References>Anwar, S., Doran, C., and; Sam, C. Y. (2009). “Committing to regional cooperation: ASEAN, globalisation and the Shin Corporation–Temasek Holdings deal.” Asia Pacific Viewpoint. 50, no. 3, 307-321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8373.2009.01403.x
Archibugi, D. (2008). The Global Commonwealth of Citizens: Toward Cosmopolitan Democracy. Princeton University Press.
Band;aacute;rcena, A., and; Porcile, G. (2022). Globalization, international asymmetries and democracy: a structuralist perspective. Oxford Development Studies, 50(3), 272-287.https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2021.2008891
Barton, G. (2014). Informal empire and the rise of one world culture. Springer https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137315922
Beausang, F. (2012). “BRICs: Beyond Developing?” In Globalization and the BRICs: Why the BRICs will not rule the world for long. Springer.https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137271600
Boss, M., Bang, H.,and; Campbell, J., (2010). The Nation-State in Transformation: Economic Globalisation, Institutional Mediation and Political Values. 1st ed. Vol. 1.Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
Chen, L., and; Lombaerde, P. D. (2019). ASEAN between globalization and regionalization. Asia Pacific Business Review, 25(5), 729-750.https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2019.1652982
Chen, X., Miao, J. T., and; Li, X. (2021). “The BRI and Globalisation.” In The Belt and Road Initiative as epochal regionalisation, 30-44. United Kingdom: Taylor and; Francis Group, 2021.
Chong, A., and; Ph?m, Q. M. (Eds.). (2020). Critical Reflections on China’s Belt and; Road Initiative (Vol.248). Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2098-9
Council on Foreign Relations. (2023). What Is ASEAN? Available at: https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/what-asean
George, J. (2001). Creating Globalisation: ‘Patriotic Internationalism’ And Symbiotic Power Relations In The Post-WW2 Era. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation (CSGR).
Dhingra, V. S. (2023). Financial development, economic growth, globalisation and environmental quality in BRICS economies: evidence from ARDL bounds test approach. Economic Change and Restructuring, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-022-09481-6
Held, D. (1995). Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Stanford University Press.
Hopkins, A. G. (2011). Globalisation in world history. Random House.
Clark, I. (1997). Globalization and Fragmentation. Oxford University Press.
Kingsbury, B., Krisch, N., and; Stewart, R. B. (2005). The Emergence of Global Administrative Law. Law and Contemporary Problems, 68(3), 15-61.
Li, J., Qian, G., Zhou, K. Z., Lu, J., and; Liu, B. (2021). Belt and Road Initiative, globalization and institutional changes: implications for firms in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1-14.https://doi.org/10.1080/2578711X.2020.1823711
Lin, S., Yang, Y., Alff, H., Frost, M. R., Kaneti, M., Oakes, T., ... and; Winter, T. (2021). Review forum reading Tim Winter’s Geocultural Power: China’s Quest to Revive the Silk Roads for the Twenty-first Century, University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2019). 304 pp.; bibliog.; index. ISBN: 978-0-226-65835-3 US $27.50 (paperback). Political Geography, 84, 102297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102297
Madeley, J. (2013). Brics. Appropriate Technology, 40(2), 30–30.
Ministry of External Affairs. (2023). National Statement by External Affairs Minister Dr S.Jaishankar at the General Debate of the 78th UNGA. Available at: https://www.mea.gov.in/Speeches-Statements.htm?dtl/37148/National+Statement+b +External+Affairs+Minister+Dr+S+Jaishankar+at+the+General+Debate+of+the+78t+UNGA
Pomeranz, K. (2000). The great divergence: China, Europe, and the making of the modern world economy. Princeton University Press.
Rai, A. (2018). Quadrilateral Security Dialogue 2 (Quad 2.0)–a credible strategic construct or mere “foam in the ocean”?. Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India, 14(2), 138-148.https://doi.org/10.1080/09733159.2019.1572260
Roberts, C. A., Armijo, L. E., and; Katada, S. N. (2018). The BRICS and collective financial statecraft. Oxford University Press.
Rodrik, D. (2011). The globalization paradox: why global markets, states, and democracy Canand;#39;t coexist. Oxford University Press.
Rodrik, D. (2000). How Far Will International Economic Integration Go? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(1), 177-186.
Sarkar, U. (2014). BRICS: An opportunity for a transformative South? South Asian Survey, 21(1-2), 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971523115592495
Singh, R. A., and; Bawa, T. (2023). “Slow but Steady. How is the Quad Holding Up?” Available at: https://intpolicydigest.org/the-platform/slow-but-steady-how-is-the-quad-holding-up/
Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and Its Discontents. W.W. Norton and; Company.
Upadhyay, S. (2021). Covid-19 and Quad’s “Soft” Reorientation. Research in Globalization, 3, 100069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2021.100069
UNI (2021). Quad reflects globalisation, says Jaishankar, dismisses comparisons with NATO. In United News of India. HT Digital Streams Limited.
Winter, T. (2019). Geocultural power: China’s quest to revive the Silk Roads for the Twenty-First Century. University of Chicago Press.
Yamei. (2017). Full text of President Xi’s speech at opening of Belt and Road forum: Speech by His Excellency, President Xi Jinping of the People’s Republic of China. Available at: http://www.xinhuanet.com//english/2017-05/14/c_136282982.htm.</References>
</References>
</Journal>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>